Metabolic Comparison

CT-388 vs SLU-PP-332

Comparison of CT-388 (Moderate evidence) and SLU-PP-332 (Very Low evidence).

Last updated: February 12, 2026

CT-388

Moderate Evidence
View full dossier

SLU-PP-332

Very Low Evidence
View full dossier

Overview

CT-388 and SLU-PP-332 are both studied in the peptide research space.

CT-388: A dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist acquired by Roche through the $2.

SLU-PP-332: A small molecule ERR (Estrogen-Related Receptor) agonist developed at Saint Louis University.

Evidence Comparison

AspectCT-388SLU-PP-332
Evidence LevelModerateVery Low
Human Studies60
Preclinical Studies25
Total Sources88

Key Differences

AspectCT-388SLU-PP-332
CategoryMetabolicMetabolic
Evidence StrengthModerateVery Low
Total Sources88
Human Studies60

Summary

  • CT-388: Moderate evidence with 8 total sources (6 human)
  • SLU-PP-332: Very Low evidence with 8 total sources (0 human)

This comparison is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any decisions about peptide use.

Stay Updated on Peptide Comparisons

Get notified when we publish new comparison dossiers and evidence reviews.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Disclaimer: This comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Individual responses to medications vary. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making treatment decisions.